| |
Ivan the Terrible in Cinema
No films had been made about one of the most
fascinating characters in history until Stalin
requested Eisenstein to make his classic, IVAN THE
TERRIBLE in 1945. None were made since. But even the
great Eisenstein portrayed Ivan as a single man
after the death of his first wife Anastasia,
ignoring the historic fact that he took a second
wife, Maria Temroko Idarova and was married to her
from 1561-1569..
For Eisenstein, the 1560s were the greatest decade
of Ivan’s reign; and Russian historians concur that
it was the period of his highest achievements. Yet
Eisenstein totally ignores the partnership of Ivan
IV and Tsarina Maria, even though it was Maria who
convinced the increasingly psychotic Tsar to create
the governmental framework which eventually made him
the absolute ruler of the realm by the end of the
bloody decade. Eisenstein also ignored the existence
and vital role played by Archbishop Makarii in this
period of Ivan’s life. The two men’s constant
battles over the power of state vs. church is
vividly reminiscent of the struggles between Henry
II and Becket in the film classic BECKET, as well as
those between Henry VIII and Sir Thomas More in A
MAN FOR ALL SEASONS.
It was difficult even for Eisenstein to portray this
complex man and his Tsarina. His choice was to
ignore the existence of Maria and show all the
characters around Ivan as weak, conniving figures –
probably at the insistence of Stalin who faced
similar internal threats. The result was a Communist
propagandist theatrical drama. Stalin wanted the
film to develop the cult of the hero for a nation at
war. But Eisenstein failed (in Stalin’s eyes) and
the film was banned. Even so, Eisenstein’s film is
full of historical falsehoods in order to
accommodate Communist ideology.
Why Should This Film be Made?
Not only is IVAN AND MARIA great entertainment; not
only does it fill a vacuum in historical filmmaking,
but it also shows the unchanging nature of the
Russian character which has remained alienated and
ostracized for centuries, misunderstood and
misinterpreted – even today. The characterizations
in the film will shed light on the unchanging nature
of Russians and how they will respond to the
competitive pressures of the capitalist world in
which they find themselves for the first time in
their long history -- yet again, alienated and
misunderstood.
On the international front, Russia finds itself
embroiled in an endless war in Chechnya while
trouble brews in other largely Muslim nations on her
southern flank – exactly the same position Russia
found herself during the reign of Ivan IV. |
|